4 official sources
CORDIS, UKRI, ANR & TED
Funding and public procurement opportunities across Europe.
Multi-source European battery sales intelligence
Find the European battery projects most relevant to your instrument sales team.
We monitor multiple European research-funding sources, combine overlapping records and rank the projects relevant to your equipment portfolio. Public procurement data adds a procurement signal only when a reliable match exists.
Free historical sample: 5 real project signals with a reliable public source reference date at least 90 days old. Paid reports use the same analysis method with current data and your sales profile.
Up to date
Latest available source data
Refreshed for every weekly delivery.
Personalised
Built around your sales profile
Your products, countries and priorities.
Ranked weekly
Best sales opportunities first
Prioritised by fit, timing and buying signals.
Historical sample signals
The same ranking logic, shown historically.
The on-page examples remain a compact view of delayed project signals. The XLSX download opens with a unified ranked account list; the CSV retains the complete delayed analytical export.
Historical demonstrationExample profile: Europe, all monitored equipment categories and default weights. Every displayed example uses a reliable public source reference date at least 90 days in the past; project-start and operational timestamps are not accepted as fallbacks. Paying customers use their own products, territory and weights.
Waste as Valuable Elements for Europe
Sales Priority
81/ 100
- Funding source: CORDIS
Likely equipment need
Battery dismantling & recycling systems
Strong evidence
Project-specific technical evidence
The project explicitly targets recovery of critical raw materials from spent Li-ion batteries and names microwave-radiation and mechanochemical recovery approaches. These are battery-material recovery processes that can require dedicated processing equipment when scaled.
Sales Priority
81/ 100
The primary ranking metric for this historical example profile — not a purchase probability.
Built from 8 weighted factors
Product relevance, novelty, timing, funding context, procurement evidence, actionability, organisation fit and geography.
Open the breakdown below to see every factor value and weight.
How is this Sales Priority built?
Product relevance?
How closely the project's planned work matches the equipment category you sell.
85
Novelty?
How recently the opportunity first became visible in the monitored source data. This is radar novelty, not a known procurement date.
100
Timing?
How close the project is to starting or its early execution phase. This is a timing proxy, not a known purchase date.
72
Funding signal?
Project or grant funding used only as broad project-scale context. It is not an equipment budget.
72
Procurement signal?
Strength of source-based evidence that new equipment or additional technical capacity may be required.
72
Actionability?
How clearly a relevant organisation and a practical next sales-research step can be identified.
68
Organisation fit?
How plausible the identified organisation is as a user or buyer of this equipment category.
72
Geographic fit?
Whether the opportunity falls inside the customer's selected sales territory.
100
Paid reports use the same formula but recalculate it for the customer's territory, product categories and configured weights.
Supporting Sales Priority input · 19% default weightProcurement signal: Clear indicationThe project describes new or additional technical capacity, but no confirmed equipment order.
Why this procurement signal?
Applied criterionThe source contains one specific grounded new-capacity cue (physical pilot or scale-up activity) and no source-backed indication that existing equipment will cover it.
Project-specific assessmentPre-industrial scale-up is explicit, but the source contains no purchase, tender, new-laboratory, capacity-expansion, or equipment-reuse statement. Whether existing facilities can be used is unknown.
Source passages used
CORDIS:objective:1“The developed protocols will be scaled-up to pre-industrial level”
CORDIS:keywords:2“Process scaling-up”
What remains unknown
The available CORDIS text identifies recovery methods and pre-industrial scale-up but does not specify unit operations, laboratory assets, equipment suppliers, facility ownership, acquisition plans, or which consortium member performs each activity.
€1.1m
Project or grant funding
Broad project context, not an equipment budget.
Historical reference date: 2025-12-22
SAFE, SUSTAINABLE, AND HIGH-THROUGHPUT PRODUCTION OF RELIABLE LITHIUM METAL ANODES FOR GEN 4B/4C/5 BATTERIES
Sales Priority
75/ 100
- Funding source: CORDIS
Likely equipment need
Electrode mixing, coating & converting
Strong evidence
Project-specific technical evidence
The project explicitly names roll-to-roll production of lithium-metal anodes, in-vacuum protective coating, and laser cutting of anodes. These are concrete electrode-production and converting steps.
Integrated pilot lines & manufacturing automation
Strong evidence
Project-specific technical evidence
A real-world first-of-a-kind lithium-metal-anode production pilot line is explicitly planned, with inline monitoring and fully automated quality control across multiple production activities.
Sales Priority
75/ 100
The primary ranking metric for this historical example profile — not a purchase probability.
Built from 8 weighted factors
Product relevance, novelty, timing, funding context, procurement evidence, actionability, organisation fit and geography.
Open the breakdown below to see every factor value and weight.
How is this Sales Priority built?
Product relevance?
How closely the project's planned work matches the equipment category you sell.
82
Novelty?
How recently the opportunity first became visible in the monitored source data. This is radar novelty, not a known procurement date.
100
Timing?
How close the project is to starting or its early execution phase. This is a timing proxy, not a known purchase date.
38
Funding signal?
Project or grant funding used only as broad project-scale context. It is not an equipment budget.
92
Procurement signal?
Strength of source-based evidence that new equipment or additional technical capacity may be required.
72
Actionability?
How clearly a relevant organisation and a practical next sales-research step can be identified.
52
Organisation fit?
How plausible the identified organisation is as a user or buyer of this equipment category.
72
Geographic fit?
Whether the opportunity falls inside the customer's selected sales territory.
100
Paid reports use the same formula but recalculate it for the customer's territory, product categories and configured weights.
Supporting Sales Priority input · 19% default weightProcurement signal: Clear indicationThe project describes new or additional technical capacity, but no confirmed equipment order.
Why this procurement signal?
Applied criterionThe source contains multiple grounded new-capacity cues (physical pilot or scale-up activity; additional technical capacity), but no explicit equipment purchase or tender.
Project-specific assessmentThe source expressly supports an equipment-upgrade requirement and pilot-scale production deployment. It also explicitly states that an existing R2R vacuum coater will be used as the starting point, so full replacement or entirely new-line procurement is not established. No new laboratory or separate testing infrastructure is described.
Source passages used
CORDIS:objective:1“Upgrade of the production equipment”
CORDIS:objective:1“reaching TRL7 by demonstration of a real-word 1st of kind EU-based LiM anode production pilot line”
CORDIS:objective:1“targeting a high production capacity”
CORDIS:objective:1“starting from a R2R vacuum coater already available at ABEE's (pre-STELLAR)”
What remains unknown
The objective names production methods and upgrades but does not state whether equipment will be purchased, leased, modified, or accessed through existing facilities. It does not identify suppliers, budgets, machine specifications, or allocations of tasks among consortium members. “Validation ... in functioning cells” does not itself establish cell-cycling, cell-assembly, or other test-equipment needs.
€7.9m
Project or grant funding
Broad project context, not an equipment budget.
Historical reference date: 2026-04-30
Visualizing Transition Metal Ion Dissolution: Understanding Degradation in Ni-rich Layered Oxide Cathodes
Sales Priority
77/ 100
- Funding source: CORDIS
Likely equipment need
Electron, probe & high-resolution microscopy
Strong evidence
Project-specific technical evidence
The project explicitly names interferometric scattering microscopy (iSCAT) and an optical nanoscopy method for battery-cathode particle imaging.
Operando, in-situ & cell diagnostics
Strong evidence
Project-specific technical evidence
A multimodal operando platform is explicitly proposed for real-time, correlative visualization of ion release and lithium distribution in NMC particles.
Sales Priority
77/ 100
The primary ranking metric for this historical example profile — not a purchase probability.
Built from 8 weighted factors
Product relevance, novelty, timing, funding context, procurement evidence, actionability, organisation fit and geography.
Open the breakdown below to see every factor value and weight.
How is this Sales Priority built?
Product relevance?
How closely the project's planned work matches the equipment category you sell.
82
Novelty?
How recently the opportunity first became visible in the monitored source data. This is radar novelty, not a known procurement date.
100
Timing?
How close the project is to starting or its early execution phase. This is a timing proxy, not a known purchase date.
72
Funding signal?
Project or grant funding used only as broad project-scale context. It is not an equipment budget.
62
Procurement signal?
Strength of source-based evidence that new equipment or additional technical capacity may be required.
72
Actionability?
How clearly a relevant organisation and a practical next sales-research step can be identified.
52
Organisation fit?
How plausible the identified organisation is as a user or buyer of this equipment category.
58
Geographic fit?
Whether the opportunity falls inside the customer's selected sales territory.
100
Paid reports use the same formula but recalculate it for the customer's territory, product categories and configured weights.
Supporting Sales Priority input · 19% default weightProcurement signal: Clear indicationThe project describes new or additional technical capacity, but no confirmed equipment order.
Why this procurement signal?
Applied criterionThe source contains one specific grounded new-capacity cue (new test infrastructure) and no source-backed indication that existing equipment will cover it.
Project-specific assessmentThe record supports development of new project-specific diagnostic infrastructure, but contains no procurement, tender, acquisition, laboratory-construction, scale-up, or capacity-expansion language. Whether existing instruments can be reused is unknown; no reuse arrangement is described.
Source passages used
CORDIS:objective:1“This project proposes the development of a multimodal operando optical imaging platform”
What remains unknown
The objective text is truncated at its end and does not provide a work-package-level equipment list. It establishes microscopy and operando-platform development, but is silent on cell configuration, electrochemical control hardware, acquisition plans, budgets, and use of existing facilities.
€260.3k
Project or grant funding
Broad project context, not an equipment budget.
Historical reference date: 2026-04-01
Download the unified ranked account reportOpen the prioritised account view in Excel or use the complete analytical rows in your own workflow.
Free proof versus paid value
Evaluate quality historically. Act on current signals.
Historical sample
Proof of quality
- Eight delayed historical projects
- Europe + all monitored categories
- Default example weights
- Same qualification and scoring method as paid reports
- Formatted XLSX and raw CSV
Paid weekly radar
Current + personalised
- Current qualified signals
- Your equipment categories
- Your countries and territory
- Your priority weights
- Weekly email + CSV
The workflow
Official data in. Qualified territory list out.
Monitor
We track CORDIS, UKRI Gateway to Research and ANR. TED is checked separately for relevant public procurement signals.
Combine
Overlapping funding records are combined so the same project does not appear as several sales opportunities.
Research and rank
Project evidence is assessed by equipment category. Customer-specific Sales Priority combines product fit, timing, geography, actionability and procurement evidence.
Deliver the best matches
Your report contains up to ten newly qualified candidates, ranked by Sales Priority. Procurement evidence is a major factor and tie-breaker, not the only decision rule.
Why this is not another database
Identify the European battery projects most relevant to your equipment portfolio.
- ✓Relevant projects come to you
We monitor the sources, filter the noise and send you the opportunities worth reviewing.
- ✓Only supported equipment categories are shown
Each category needs project-specific evidence before it reaches the report.
- ✓Technical need and procurement stay separate
When a project appears to need a type of equipment but the sources do not show that new equipment will be purchased, we say so.
Four-week pilot
Four weeks of focused monitoring. €49.
We monitor your selected equipment categories and European sales territory for four weeks, then surface new matching opportunities as they appear. Quiet weeks stay honest—no repeated or weaker signals are added just to fill a report.
- Weekly monitoring and reporting
- One product family or up to 5 categories
- All Europe or your selected sales areas
- Formatted XLSX + raw CSV
- Official source links
- No automatic renewal
€49one-time four-week pilot